This will create a local directory called example-app containing all the cloned repo files. Here we will first clone the example-app repo from Bitbucket project using below git clone command. How to Merge Git Release Branch with both Master and DevelopĪlso Read: Solved: "error: src refspec master does not match any" when using git push Step 1: PrerequisitesĪ) You should have a running System(in my case it is Ubuntu 20.04 LTS) with git package installed.ī) You should have access to clone the Repo.Ĭ) You should have commit access to master and develop branch. So that both master and develop contain the same files. So once my release branch is ready to merge because the deployment can only happen from master as per our branching strategy so we need to first merge release-1.0.1 branch with master and then with develop. Along with that it also contains all the changes that we need to add in the next release. Here release-1.0.1 branch is created from develop. But since master is critical for production so all the release branches starts from develop. In other words, develop is the exact replica of master. Usually develop and master branch contains the same files. In my Lab setup, I have three branches in Bitbucket - release-1.0.1, develop and master. So it is utmost important to run all the steps accurately to avoid any unforeseen error. While the above steps looks quite simple but sometimes implementing this can be quite challenging in a real environment where you might encounter few issues. So the next time, when you are working on a hotfix or on a release or feature then you can start working by just creating a branch from develop. Once all the testing is completed and it is ready to be promoted in production then you need to first merge your release branch with master and then later with develop. Or the other way is that you can just create a branch from the latest commit of the test branch and later edit the commit message as per your needs by doing it this way you can have just a single commit which will be the latest commit from the test branch.If you are following a branching strategy in which you first start working on a release by creating a release branch from develop and then deploying your release branch in pre production environment post approval. So by doing this i think it might help you to satisfy your needs. You could actually delete everything, and write only one line of the commit message you want to show after merging into staging branch. Once the staging branch is created you will now need to merge the changes of testing branch to your staging branch.Īn editor should be popup with all the commit logs, and files changed from test branch. git checkout -b staging (from master branch) So what is the first step you should do is to create a new branch named staging in your case from the master branch.ġ. So now the staging branch that needs to be created should be the same as your master branch. So as of now you have three branches where in which now you want to have staging branch as the intermediate between the master branch and the test branch. Hi your need is that you have some messy or some commits which you don't need to be mentioned or displayed.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |